Monday 12 February 2018

" The Greenies try for political relevance by creating National Division "








(Me at my place)

I am coming out and proudly declaring the following:

1. I am an Aussie white bloke of European descent.
2. I am heterosexual.
3. Although not religious I tend to believe in the so-called Christian values and
beliefs.

13/2/2018

Subject: " The Greenies try for political relevance by creating National Division " 3.


G/day people wherever you are??.




Senator Richard De Natale the Federal Head Greenie.

I believe it is well excepted that the Aussie Greenies are a very narrow prospective,
niche,socialistic verging on communistic,all care and no responsibility,anti-Aussie,
opportunistic political lightweights,exploitative,ambulance chasers minor party with
at best a 10% vote at national federal elections,where with the advent of many other
minor parties and so-called
independents their Federal Political influence/numbers
are diminishing at every Federal election,even in the Aussie state parliaments they
are more of a nuisance/
annoyance value as they no longer hold the balance of
power across the Aussie
political spectrum,and Aussie is across the board a better
place for it!!!

However the Greenies are now trying to destroy,disrupt our Aussie way of life by
stealth and via our many 100's of local governments by getting Greenie Party members
on the various
councils,and by wedge politics and dividing the various communities with
left bias and noisy demonstrations are making it as difficult as possible for businesses
to invest in the communities by insisting on outrageous/scandalous politically correct
Greenie environmental terms and conditions making it just to unprofitable to continue.

The Greenies try to find anything controversial in order to get headlines in order to
try and become politically relevant where they tried immigration and failed miserably
to get the Aussie population on side!! climate change which according to many polls
is becoming far less relevant in regard to the majority of Aussies priorities,gay
marriage which the major parties,Liberal Coalition/Labor Parties,took over and had
it passed through parliament not needing the Greenie vote.

So all in all the Greenies stand for little of which the majority of Aussies (90%) value
and
therefore is it any wonder they are a walking political disaster and at best a
" Protest
Vote " amongst the disenchanted Aussie voters with the major LNP/Labor
parties!! therefore have " that and Buckley's " of ever achieving government and the
Treasury benches!! AMEN to that people, AMEN to that.

However people there is no end to these devious political low life Greenies in their
insatiable/voracious appetite for political relevance and headlines by dividing communities
and in fact the Aussie Nation as whole, and what better to divide the Aussie Nation than
racialism,and to condemn our " Australia Day on the 26th of January of each year " as
invasion day in regard to our indigenous population of Aboriginals and Torres Strait
Islanders and want the 26th of January changed to some other day ? not sure what day
but change
it anyway.

The Aboriginals/Torres Strait Islanders amount to about 3% of the Aussie population of
about 700,000 made up of many 100's of tribes and communities,and ofcourse as the
Aussie population grows from immigration and non-Aboriginal births their 3% and
relevance is shrinking
virtually by the day.

The vast majority of the Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islanders,say about 80%,are totally
reliant on the non-Aboriginal/Torres Islander Tax Payers ( Whities or worse they refer
to us as ) for their housing,medical and welfare generally.

Therefore as such the non-Aboriginal/Torres Islanders Tax Payers having problems,
financial and otherwise,to put it mildly,and considering that at
least 90% of us have
absolutely no " Ancestral Lineage " to what happened 200 plus years
ago on the 26th
of January 1788,and as such the Aboriginal/Torres Islanders rent-a-crowd where the
majority look like they could do with a good shower and clean up and wear some
clean
decent cloths,Greenies plus the other rent-a-crowd just looking for trouble,continue
to
attack,demonise the good Aussie citizens that currently supply the majority of the
indigenous welfare from their
hard earned taxes even though their doing it tough in
every which way,will eventually say "Enough is Enough"
and will start forcing their
political representatives in the future to make changes far less favourable to the
Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islanders,especially when it comes to referendums/plebiscites
in regard
to changing the Aussie constitution in their favour.

Then where will these devious,divisive Greenies be??

I will tell you,long gone enjoying their fully tax payer funded retirement,writing books,
giving public speeches and pointing the finger for the national disasters they have
helped
to orchestrate,mastermind and engineer on everyone else.

People I have not long received the following information which I believe for the sake
of realistic harmony across the board in Aussie should be well and truly broadcast,
before these low life lefty Greenies can create divisions in the Aussie nation making
the
situation far worse than it is currently and into the future.

Sir Mike Howe, but you can call me Mike. scroll down.

If you believe in what we as a Nation stand for, then read this and hopefully you may
understand a little of what we should believe in.

At the end the part about Germany, Japan and the USA is very important also and
puts things in a different light.
There is a fundamental point which goes to the heart of this debate that
literally no one, to date, seems to have picked up on. Hence, this article.
Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded.





here's a growing debate over Australia Day. Photo: Luis Enrique Ascui
This 'Right of Conquest' doctrine was first conceived by the International
Law Commission of the United Nations and later adopted as UN General
Assembly Resolution 3314.
Provided that all citizens of a lawfully conquered territory are granted equal
rights by the local law, international law doesn't consider the descendants
of the conqueror and the conquered as two separate peoples.
This in turn invalidates any claims to separate land rights under the same
jurisdiction.
As one of the 193 member states of the United Nations, Australia is not
exempt from this doctrine.
Yet we do recognise separate land rights because the historic Mabo
Decision in 1992 rested on the correct presumption that Australia was
settled, not invaded
.
In their ruling, Justices Brennan, Deane, Gaudron, Toohey, Mason and
McHugh acknowledged that native title could have been intentionally
extinguished by the use of government powers, but wasn't.
They proceeded to reject the 'terra nullius' doctrine without overturning the
traditional view that the Australian landmass had in fact been settled.
Had Australia actually been invaded, the descendants of its native population
would be classified as a conquered people and their land rights would be
abolished under UN Resolution 3314.
Greens leader Richard Di Natale might like to explain to the Australian people
why he is attempting to undermine native title by implying that Australia was
invaded and conquered.
On 26 January 1788, there was no sovereign state on the landmass we
today call Australia. The land was sparsely populated with disparate
nomadic tribes without a written language and a central government.
Captain Arthur Phillip's arrival with his group of disease-stricken poorly-fed
convicts in their new prison colony, on territory claimed for the British Crown
seventeen years earlier by explorer James Cook, does not constitute an
"invasion".
Far from the brutal instincts of actual invaders like Napoleon or Hitler, early
British settlers built a colony that was surprisingly harmonious and committed
to justice.
As the first Governor of New South Wales, Phillip developed a fondness for
the native Eora people in his new colony at Port Botany.
He befriended native man Woollarawarre Bennelong who became the first
native Australian to be escorted to England to meet King George III.
The federal seat of Bennelong held by former Prime Minister John Howard
for 33 years is named after him.
Phillip once forgave a native for stealing his shovel because he understood
that in native culture people shared what they had and there was no concept
of exclusive personal belongings. Hardly the attitude of an invader.
In 1816, Governor Lachlan Macquarie appointed native leaders to act as
conduits between settlers and natives.
He welcomed the natives who aspired to be part of the new colony. Hardly
the attitude of an invader.
Violent clashes were the exception, not the norm.
At Myall Creek in 1838, some 30 natives were killed by 10 settlers and an
African in Bingara, New South Wales.
The perpetrators were trialled, 7 of the 11 involved were found guilty of
murder, and hanged.
The rule of law prevailed. Hardly what happens in invaded countries.
Whether Australia's colonisation by the British Empire should be classified
as an invasion or settlement is not a question of mere semantics.
It's a question that holds serious legal and political consequences for our
country.
For most Australians, this debate is as settled as Australia itself on 26
January 1788.
American President Abraham Lincoln once said "a house divided against
itself cannot stand."
Let's unite to recognise that 26 January is a celebration of a democratic
story that would be incomplete without the Mabo Decision.

Let's never again disparage native title by referring to our settlement as an invasion.

Happy Australia Day 2018.