To: abc news ; B.M.Gazette ; Daily
Mercury Mackay ; daily telegraph ; Penrith City Star. ; Penrith Press. ; syd morning
herald ; the australian ; The Senior ;
Wangaratta Chronicle
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:58 PM
Subject: Fw: " What's the true value of a Pollie ??? "
To: Senator Hellen Polley ; Senator Doug Cameron ; Scott Ryan ; Scott Morrison ; Scott Ludlam ; Scott Buchholz ; Scot Macdonald MLC ; Sarah Hanson-Young ; Sam Dastyari ; Sam Dastyan ; Roza Sage ; Ronald Boswell ; Robert Brown MLC ; Robert Borsak MLC ; Rob Mitchell ; Richard Marles ; Richard Di Natale ; Richard Colbeck ; Rachel Siewert ; Pryce, Colin (Sen H. Polley) ; Phil Morgans ; Peter Whish-Wilson ; Peter Dutton ; Penny Wright ; Penny Wong ; Penny Sharpe MLC ; Paul Green MLC ; Paul Fletcher ; Pat Conroy
Cc: Will Hodgman ; Warren Truss
; Warren Entsch ; Ward, Fiona (T.
Watts, MP) ; Trevor Khan MLC ; Tony
Zappia ; Tony Burke ; tony
abbott ; Tim Watts ; Tanya Plibersek ; Suzanne
Kay (Sue) Boyce ; Susan Ley ; Stuart Robert ; Steven
Ciobo ; Stephen Jones ; Stephen
Conroy ; Sophie Cotsis ; Simon Birmingham ; Simon
Bilyk ; Sharon Grierson ; Sharon Claydon ; Sharon
Bird ; Shane Rattenbury ; senator.rhiannon@aph.gov.au ; Senator Zed Seselja
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:28 PM
Subject: Fw: " What's the true value of a Pollie ???
To: Katy Gallagher MLA ; Kate
Lundy ; Kate Ellis ; Justine Elliot ; Julie
Owens ; Julie Collins ; Julie
Bishop ; Josh Frydenberg ; John
Williams ; John Robertson ; John Robertson ; John
Madigan ; John Kaye ; John
Forrest ; John Faulkner ; John
Cobb ; John Alexander ; Joe Hockey
; Joanne Ryan ; Jillian Skinner MP ; Jill
Hall ; Jeremy
Hanson ; Jenny Gardiner MLC ; Jason
Clare ; Jamie Briggs ; Jacinta Collins ; J.Macklin
; J.Fitzgibbon. ; Inwood,
Melissa (J. Cobb, MP) ; Ian McFarlane ; Ian Macdonald
Cc: Palmer United Party ; P.Secker ; P.
Neville ; O'Riely, Dennis (G. Christensen, MP)
; Office
of Helen Kroger (Senator) ; Nola Marino ; Nigel Scullion ; Nick
Xenophon ; Nick Champion ; Nathan Rees ; Natasha Griggs ; Mitch
Fifield ; Minister Truss Public ; Mike
Baird ; Michelle Rowland ; Michaelia
Cash ; Michael Ronaldson ; Michael McCormack ; Michael Keenan ; Michael Gallacher ; Michael Danby ; Melissa Parke ; Mehreen Faruqi ; McMullen, Marie (Sen I. Macdonald) ;
McCrudden, Thomas (C. Bowen, MP) ;
Mayer,
Terese (B. Katter, MP) ; Matt Thistlethwaite ; Mathias Cormann ; Mark
Quinn ; Mark Dreyfus ; Mark
Coulton ; Mark Butler MP ; Marise
Payne ; Maria Vamvakinou ; Malcom Turnbull ; Luke Hartsuyker ; Lovern,
Cathy (Sen J. McLucas) ; Louise Markus ; Louise
Clare Pratt ; Lisa Chesters ; Linda Burney ; Laurie Ferguson ; Larissa
Waters ; Lara Giddings ; Kim Carr
; Kevin Humphries ; Kevin Andrews ; Kevin Anderson MP ; Kent, Maree (A.
Robb, MP) ; Kelvin Thomson ; Kelly,
Pierrette (Sen C. Back)
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:23 PM
Subject: Fw: " What's the true value of a Pollie ??? "
To: Browne, Chris (Sen C. Bernardi)
; Bronwyn Bishop ; Brett Whiteley ; Brett
Mason ; Brendan O'Connor ; Bourne,
Chris (L. Markus, MP) ; Bob Katter ; Bob
Baldwin ; Blue Mts Greens ; Bill
Shorten ; Bill Heffernan ; Barry
Ofarrell ; Barnaby Joyce ; Barker, Kate
(Sen C. Bernardi) ; Arthur Sinodinos ; Anthony Byrne ; Anthoney
Albanese ; Anne McEwen ; Anna
Burke ; Andrew Wilkie ; Andrew Stoner ; Andrew
Robb ; Andrew Giles ; Andew Barr MLA ; Alistair Coe ; Alannah MacTiernan ; Alan
Tudge ; Alan Griffin ; Adam Searle MLC ; Adam
Bandt
Cc: Hon Warren Snowdon ; Hon Shayne Neumann ; Hon Lisa
Singh ; Hon Jan McLucas ; Hon
Don Farrell ; Hon David Feeney ; Hon
Bernie Ripoll ; Hon Amanda Rishworth ; Helen
Kroger ; Gregory Pearce ; Greg
Hunt ; Greens Party NSW ; Graham Perrett ; George Souris ; George Christensen ; George
Brandis ; Geoff Lyons ; Gary
Gray ; Garbutt, Emma (A. Bandt, MP) ; Gai
Brodtmann ; Fred Nile MLC ; Fiona
Nash ; Federal Greens Office ; Eric
Abetz ; ElectorateOffice
BlueMountains ; Ed Husic ; Duncan Gay ; Dr Jim
Chalmers ; Dr Andrew Leigh ; Don Page ; Dennis.Jensen ; David Shoebridge ; David Johnston ; David
Bushby ; Darren Chester ; Danny Newman - Dometic ; Cory
Bernardi ; Concetta Fierravanti-Wells ; Coghlan, Gai
(C. Hayes, MP) ; Cobb, John (MP) ; Clive Palmer
MP ; Clare O'Neil ; Claire
Moore ; Christopher Evans ; Christopher
Back ; Christine Milne ; Chris
Hayes ; Chris Bowen ; Cathy McGowan AO ; Catherine King ; Carol Brown ; C.Pyne ; Bruce
Scott ; Bruce Billson
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:08 PM
Subject: Fw: " What's the true value of a Pollie ??? "
( Me at my place
)
Mike's Comments - 30/4/2014.
Also on my blog : www.beautkoot.blogspot.com.au
Subject: " What's the true value of a pollie ??? "
People we are continually being told by our pollies on all sides of
politics that we - collectively - need to improve the countries productivity! that the country needs to live within it's means!
that Aussies need to improve their skills and academic qualifications! we need to think of the country first and ourselves
2nd - you know people the famous John F. Kennedy speech/quote " ask not what your country can do for you,ask what
you can do for your country " unquote.
So after reading Larry Pickerings from The Pickering Posts comments - see
down below - it got me thinking??
? How do we value and measure a pollies worth to a country - especially as
far as the hard done by tax payers are concerned?? and by what measure do we - at all levels of this over governed
country of ours - measure their productivity??
Collectively at all levels - yep even local councils if you add on the
perks of office to their annual salaries - they are very well paid especially when we include their perks of office - cars,living
away allowances,travel to and from Canberra in the case of the federal mob and outside the metropolitan areas with the state
mob plus one if not the best by world standards retirement/superannuation schemes/plans - refer to Pickerings Comments
below - fully funded by the hard done by Aussie tax payers who have absolutely in general terms nothing to compare it with
in the private sector for it's generosity !!!
Now to start with people please ignore this bullshit put about by the
pollies & bureaucrats about all the hours they put in and the volume of paper work,meetings they have to attend etc; etc; etc;
you know you have heard it all before! because there is no doubt in my mind that ( 99.9% ) of the 2.400,000 small and
medium Aussie business people in this country work just as hard - if not harder - just as long hours - if not more - without
the resources & perks available to them like the pollies!! and what is more the businesses have to raise the funds to operate and if
they run to many deficits they go broke/bankrupt!! whereas the pollies regardless of what a lousy job they do-which is
continuous at all levels-stand to lose absolutely nothing thanks to the Aussie tax payers!! they just raise the taxes,fees and
charges and in many cases we could end up in jail if we don't pay them??
I bet private enterprise would love to be able to do that to their share
holders in order to force them to refinance the enterprise no matter what financial stuff ups the Directors, Management and staff had
made!!
So what qualifies a person to become a pollie????
? Academic qualifications - none required!
? Standard of education - none specified!
? Physical attributes - from my observation in the majority of cases
obviously no standards set/required??
? Level of intelligence - none specified!
? The level of I Q and problem solving capabilities - none specified!
? Psychological Profiling - none required!
? Being able to read,write and speak English to a certain standard - none
specified!
? Being able to stand on your feet in front of an audience - hostile or
otherwise? - and put your point of view in a clear,concise, forthright,uninhibited and candid manner - if so as a regular listener
to parliament via the ABC/Internet most polles I have heard within federal,state and territory parliaments would not qualify for a
high school debating team - most of them cannot even string more than ( 12 ) consecutive words together without losing track of the
subject in hand and/or without being monotonously repetitious ? because they either have not done their homework and are
just filling in time with a heap of " Ums and/or R's "and a whole load of twaddle and/or they reckon we the listeners are to
dumb to get it the first time?? or they feign an interest/knowledge of/in a subject that it is obvious they don't have a clue in
what they are talking about!!
However/whatever generally a very poor standard of debate/discussion and
in many cases in order to be heard over the parliamentary racket by others in the chambers they shout which in most
cases makes them inaudible!!? Business acumen & experience - well as most ( say 85% ) of federal pollies
anyway I gather have never managed/run a privately funded organisation/business and the majority are either
lawyers/teachers and/or union officials I believe we can safely say that little if any business/acumen is required.? Industrial Relations from both sides of the business spectrum -
management and unions - not required! ? Having organised/run a domestic household including budgetary
responsibilities and not just in a tax payer funded monetary way? - none specified/required!
The above people are just some of the hoops you are required to
successfully jump through when applying for Senior/Executive type positions within large/multinational companies!! I know because in
my much younger days I completed a myriad of them when seeking senior/executive positions in the
marketing/sales/distribution areas- I say a myriad of them because a job
interview is a two way street and there were many of them I decided were not for
me.
There were at least (4) interviews - (2) with the management/recruitment
consultants - (2) directly with the company concerned before getting onto - if you were deemed acceptable enough - the ultimate
short list.
These positions ofcourse were very significant - if not powerful - ones
within the corporate structure!! however there were " NO " (3) to (4) year guaranteed tenure if you did a lousy ineffective job as
you get with our pollies at all levels of this over governed country of ours!!!!
You did not preside over a 2.5 trillion - yep at least 2.5 trillion
Aussie economy -! with the exception of the weather/natural disasters - you have the authority over every living/material thing from
the sky to the earths core above and below the Aussie land & territories!! you did not have the power to fine/imprison the Aussie
population! you did not have the power to declare war on other nations as we did with Iraq and Afghanistan and send some of our
finest young men/women to their horrible - and in my view being ex military - over the long term a meaningless and expensive -
tax payer wise - death!!!!
You also did not have the latitude to stand up at board,management,sales
meetings or seminars and sprout a heap of twaddle - especially the political type because yes politics is very prominent in companies & organisations - and expect to get paid for it regardless??!! like - in my view after (5) decades of listening to them
over all levels of our (3) mobs - the majority of our pollies do!!!!!!!
A pollies main aim in life - no matter who he/she is - is political
survival and this can be born out on a daily basis by the way they speak and carefully craft/phrase their words so as not to offend and be
all things to all people - and certainly not to give their opposition any ammunition to fire at them -?? what a bloody expensive
farce!!
So people who qualifies for the very powerful! well remunerated position of
an Aussie pollie??
Well just about anyone regardless!! because as you can see from the above
there is no specific criteria/standards or qualifications laid down - other than being an Aussie citizen!! - in the most part just be
a recognised sporting personality and/or suck up to the party hierarchy! shake the right hands! sprout soothing party political
lines! don't be an obvious threat to others within the party structure! and mate your in like Flynn when the husbands away!!
So ? is it any wonder this great country of ours is in a financial mess
that it is -? don't you hate it when these pollies state " Yeah but it's not as bad as other countries around the world ?? " and we
have a " Triple A Rating " WHO CARES WE DON'T LIVE IN OTHER COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD THAT'S NO EXCUSE!!!! " and the mobs that hand out these ratings played a very serious part in causing the GFC that the world is still trying to
recover from in the first place!! again what a farce!!!
People I judge others - especially pollies at all (3) of our levels of
government - with the saying " Would you buy a used car from this/that person?? " and in my view after many decades in so far as
about (80%) of them is concerned - including most of the so-called independents I would state " You have got to be bloody
joking!!! "
So people if you are not prepared to let these pollies and their carers the
bureaucrats know in no uncertain terms that they work for you/us and not the other way around!!!! and you accept this mess -
financial and otherwise - then more fool you and you and yours deserve all you cop so don't whinge!!
Well done Pickering - scroll down.
Mike Howe.
Subject:
- DON'T SHOOT JOE HOCKEY - The Pickering Post
LARRY COMMENTS ON EX - PMs RETIREMENT
LARGESE
DON'T SHOOT JOE HOCKEYThe poor bastard has inherited a mess of unprecedented proportions that is going to take a long Liberal tenure to sort out and
return to some normality - if at all.The sad reality is that Australia is made up of three types of people. Workers. Bludgers. Pensioners. And is desperately trying to
claw every dollar they can back from this hurting system...the magnifying glass has momentarily paused above the latter category.
Which is sad. We expect the pensioners to be looked after in this country. We don't want to see elderly people homeless and destitute
in Australia. And unlike Italy and Japan - we don't have a culture of always looking after our senior citizens.I have an immediate idea that could claw back quite a few millions. Means test the f*****g politicians for a start! Let's take a few
luminaries who really don't deserve the largesse we give them.The wastage in this area alone is horrendous and is a massive burden on the taxpayer. Moreover, is it justified? Do we get any value
for money? The latest revelation that both Rudd and Gillard get a $200,000 salary for the rest of their natural lives plus enormous
travel allowances, office accommodation and staffing costs is an insult given that neither was poor to start with and both now have
'jobs'. They are young enough to work. Younger than me! If I have to keep working until I am 70 plus, why don't they?A study in 2010 by the Daily Telegraph revealed that Mr Rudd, at 52, a young ex-prime minister, will receive well in excess of
$20 million worth of allowances if he lives to 85. This is despite the fact he had served just 2 1/2 years as P.M. at that point.
This of course has altered even more dramatically with his additional tenure.Then there are a host of other benefits - the airline gold pass, which entitles ex-PMs up to 40 business class flights a year.
That's almost 1 a week! If Mr Rudd takes 30 flights annually it will cost the taxpayer more than $60,000 a year. And trust me,
nobody loves flying more than Kevin Rudd! Not even bloody Sea Gulls!Once retired, he is entitled to his own office, worth about $120,000 a year in Brisbane for the rest of his life and four staff,
which political insiders say will cost $240,000 a year. What? The Rudd's new multi-million home doesn't have room for a home office?Mr Rudd would also be entitled to the lease of a car worth up to $55,000 for the rest of his life. Leasing experts say this would be
worth $1000 to 1500 a month. And Mr Rudd will receive all of these benefits on top of his wife's estimated $210 million fortune!Surely this good luck is the result of considerable 'Government' work being put her way and rules them out of any more wanton
generosity from the Australian people.Add to this, Gillard. This former communist who has now embraced the capitalist ideal with both arms and not a whimper of
complaint I notice. She has already ditched the brick veneer in Altona for a swanky pool-side ponderosa in leafy Adelaide no doubt
made possible by a $500,000 salary and ongoing perks.My point is this. I have had to make cuts to my life because things change. The expensive office I used to lease in Melbourne is gone
because, with the internet I can now work from home. I now use consultants rather than employ up to 10 people which today would
send me broke. I now drive a ute because it is cheaper to register and insure. Cost cutting measures made to ensure I can continue to
work in a country that is very much prejudiced against senior aged workers.Mrs Renny is not happy. I have taken over a picturesque corner of our winter lounge room and in her words - I am a messer! When
the drawing board comes out, which it does at least once a month, the kitchen table is also rendered unserviceable. Not to mention
several square yards around it.Why is it then that we continue to provide multiple millions to give these buggers swanky offices to run their now quite irrelevant
lives from? I mean what has Hawke's or Keating's offices churned out in the past few years that justifies these silly extravagances?
Books about them? Utterances from them? Both could be made from their kitchen tables surely! Does an Ex-PM really need an office
that costs up to $14,000 a month? They have large homes with room for an office. None lives in a 'bed-sit'. None even knows what
a 'bed-sit' is! Maybe they should become pensioners and find out.Just so I am being even handed here - according to the 2010 figures Keating was in fact the most frugal as he keeps staffing costs
low by engaging people on a part-time and ad hoc basis.Each former PM is entitled to at least two staff, including a senior private secretary, and the annual wages bill of each is nearly
$300,000. Mr Keating saves about $70,000 a year by using staff as he needs them instead of full time appointees.However, new figures have come to light revealing that in the seven months after leaving office, Mr Howard spent $109,892 on
limousine services, evenly split between the government Comcar service and private hire cars. Mr Howard's office rental was the
highest at $13,853 a month, closely followed by former PM Malcolm Fraser, whose 101 Collins St office in Melbourne costs taxpayers
$12,122 a month.Former Labor PMs Whitlam and Hawke have offices on adjacent floors in Sydney's Potts Point at 100 William St. The monthly cost for
each is $7464 and $7898 respectively. Mr Keating's office is also in Potts Point, in Manning St, and costs slightly less at $7434 a month.The former PMs also have their home and mobile phone bills paid by taxpayers, as well as unlimited allowances for publications, a
private self-drive car, and air fares for them and their spouse. (Which really irks in the case of Therese Rein who has $210 million in
the bank for Chrissakes!)These are in addition to their pensions under the generous former Parliamentary superannuation scheme, which gives them a pension
INDEXED TO CURRENT MPs’SALARIES FOR LIFE! The payout they receive depends on their length of service in Parliament, which is accelerated in the case of prime
ministers and their final salary.Each PM can usually expect to receive about 70 per cent of the incumbent's salary, unless they chose to take a lump sum on retirement.
(I thank the Daily Telegraph for doing the hard yards here with the figures and info.)I have nothing against paying our PM a wage that reflects the importance of their job, but I have lots against them making millions from
us when they a) don't really need it and b) don't really deserve it anymore.But now, the ones facing the fiscal axe, are the poor bloody pensioners who have worked and paid tax all their bloody lives! As for the
bludgers.. well that's a whole separate issue.
