" (NOT) The New Yorker Magizine "

( Me at my place )

I am coming out and proudly declaring the following:
1. I am an Aussie white bloke of European decent!

2. I am heterosexual!

3. Although not religious I tend to believe in the so-called Christian values and beliefs!
Sir Mike's Comments 17/9/2016.
Also on my blog: www.beautkoot.blogspot.com.au
www.wordpress.com.
URL: http://beautkoot.blogspot.com.au

Subject: " (NOT) The New Yorker Magazine ".


According to ' Snopes ' this article attached, refer below, was not written by either
The New Yorker or Bloomberg but by Don Fredrick's a small government advocate
and President Obama birth certificate conspiracy theorist and was originally
published on his blog.

However I don't care who wrote it because I am more than positive that 10's of
millions of Americans agree with the sentiments quoted here, even though they
may not want to vote for Trump they are just as skeptical, if not more so, about
Clinton.

From my point of view I believe the still most powerful nation on earth ? how long
for with China fast approaching at ' Warp Speed ' is anyone's guess, there is a very
dramatic need for a massive political and administrative change needed in the USA
as a example to the rest of the world.

As with Aussie, USA and even the UK the ' Two Party ' systems just keep rolling
out more of the same, going through the political recycling process, while the
" Political Elite " across the board and political spectrum continue to allow these
countries to financially race to the bottom as a result of short term, short sighted,
political self interest by not rocking the various nations boats with the view of
getting re-elected at the next election!!!

However people if this article, scroll down, does not get you at least thinking about

where our so-called various government/political systems are taking us, and is that

the way you want to go, especially in regard to your/our future generations, and you

believe " She'll be Right Mate " the system has worked for decades, don't fix what
ain't broken attitude, then don't whinge when you find that even allowing for a certain

amount of political skulduggery you have been seriously lied too and deceived,

and you find the nations situation across the board far worse than you could have
imagined, because there will only be one bunch of ' Suckers/Mugs ' that will take the

brunt and financial pain of the out come and that will be you! your loved ones, and

your/our future generations.

Sir Mike Howe - but you can call me Mike. Scroll Down.

Believe this or not

This is absolutely brilliant. A surprising article from
the New Yorker Magazine.

This magazine has always been a left wing apologizer
so this article is even more amazing. Don’t pass it up.
No matter who your favorite candidate might be,
the article is an interesting read. The author is
a political correspondent for Bloomberg and wrote
extensively about Obama before he was nominated.

Don't just read this . . . pass it on to your kids and anyone
you know who may have bought the idea that voting for
Trump is an act of treason. He isn't. He is the only
chance we have as a country to save ourselves - and
this article - from a very liberal magazine - tells it like it is.
From The New Yorker Magazine on Donald Trump
"Who is Donald Trump?"

The better question may be, "What is Donald Trump?"
The answer?
He is a giant middle finger from average Americans to the
political and media establishment.
Some Trump supporters are like the 60's white girls who
dated black guys just to annoy their parents. But most Trump
supporters have simply had it with the Demo-socialists
and the "Republicans In Name Only." They know there isn't a
dime's worth of difference between Hillary Rodham and Jeb
Bush, and only a few cents worth between Rodham and the
other GOP candidates.
The Trump supporters figure they might as well have some fun
tossing Molotov cocktails at Wall Street and Georgetown while
they watch the nation collapse. Besides - lightning might strike;
Trump might get elected, and he might actually fix a few things.
Stranger things have happened (the nation elected an
Islamo-Marxist in 2008 and Bruce Jenner now wears designer
dresses.

Millions of conservatives are justifiably furious. They gave the
Republicans control of the House in 2010 and control of the
Senate in 2014, and have seen them govern no differently than
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Yet those same voters are
supposed to trust the GOP in 2016? Why?

Trump did not come from out of nowhere. His candidacy was
created by the last six years of Republican failures.

No reasonable person can believe that any of the establishment
candidates [dems or reps] will slash federal spending, rein in the
Federal Reserve, cut burdensome business regulations, reform
the tax code, or eliminate useless federal departments
(the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development,
Energy, etc.).
Even Ronald Reagan was unable to eliminate the Department of
Education. (Of course, getting shot at tends to make a person
less of a risk-taker.) No reasonable person can believe that any
of the nation's major problems will be solved by Rodham, Bush,
and the other dishers of donkey fazoo now eagerly eating corn in
Iowa and pancakes in New Hampshire.

Many Americans, and especially Trump supporters, have had it with:

· Anyone named Bush
· Anyone named Clinton
· Anyone who's held political office
· Political correctness
· Illegal immigration
· Massive unemployment
· Phony "official" unemployment and inflation figures
· Welfare waste and fraud
· People faking disabilities to go on the dole
· VA waiting lists
· TSA airport groping
· ObamaCare
· The Federal Reserve's money-printing schemes
· Wall Street crooks like Jon Corzine
· Michelle Obama's vacations
· Michelle Obama's food police
· Barack Obama's golf
· Barack Obama's arrogant and condescending lectures
· Barack Obama's criticism/hatred of America
· Valerie Jarrett
· " Holiday trees"
· Hollywood hypocrites
· Global warming nonsense
· Cop killers
· Gun confiscation threats
· Stagnant wages
· Boys in girls' bathrooms
· Whiny, spoiled college students who can't even place the
Civil War in the correct century . and that's just the short list.

Trump supporters believe that no Democrat wants to address
these issues, and that few Republicans have the courage to
address these issues. They certainly know that none of the
establishment candidates are better than barely listening to
them.

Trump is their way of saying, "Screw you, Hillary Rodham
Rove Bush!"

The more the talking head political pundits insult the Trump
supporters, the more supporters he gains. (The only pundits
who seem to understand what is going on are Democrats
Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell and Republican John LeBoutillier.
All the others argue that the voters will eventually "come to their
senses" and support an establishment candidate.)

But America does not need a tune-up at the same old garage.
It needs a new engine installed by experts - and neither Rodham
nor Bush are mechanics with the skills or experience to install it.
Hillary Rodham is not a mechanic; she merely manages a garage
her philandering husband abandoned.Jeb Bush is not a mechanic;
he merely inherited a garage. Granted,Trump is also not a mechanic,
but he knows where to find the best ones to work in his garage.

He won't hire his brother-in-law or someone to whom he owes a
favor; he will hire someone who lives and breathes cars.

"How dare they revolt!" the "elites" are bellowing.Well, the citizens
are daring to revolt, and the RINOs had better get used to it.

"But Trump will hand the election to Clinton!" That is what the Karl
Rove-types want people to believe, just as the leftist media eagerly
shoved "Maverick" McCain down GOP throats in 2008 - knowing
he would lose to Obama.

But even if Trump loses and Rodham wins, she would not be
dramatically different than Bush or most of his fellow candidates.

They would be nothing more than caretakers, not working to
restore America 's greatness but merely presiding over the
collapse of a massively in-debt, misdirected nation.A nation
can perhaps survive open borders;a nation can perhaps survive
a generous welfare system. But no nation can survive both -
and there is little evidence that the establishment candidates of
either party understand that. The United States cannot forever
continue on the path it is on. At some point it will be destroyed by
its debt.

Yes, Trump speaks like a bull wander[ing] through a china shop,
but the truth is that the borders do need to be sealed; we cannot
afford to feed, house, and clothe 200,000 Syrian immigrants for
decades (even if we get inordinately lucky and none of them are
ISIS infiltrators or Syed Farook wannabes); the world is at war
with radical Islamists; all the world's glaciers are not melting; and
Rosie O'Donnell is a fat pig.

Is Trump the perfect candidate? Of course not. Neither was
Ronald Reagan. But unless we close our borders and restrict
immigration, all the other issues are irrelevant. One terrorist
blowing up a bridge or a tunnel could kill thousands. One jihadist
poisoning a city's water supply could kill tens of thousands.

One electromagnetic pulse attack from a single Iranian nuclear
device could kill tens of millions.
Faced with those possibilities, most Americans probably don't
care that Trump relied on eminent domain to grab up a final
quarter acre of property for a hotel, or that he boils the blood of
the Muslim Brotherhood thugs running the Council on
American-Islamic Relations.

While Attorney General Loretta Lynch's greatest fear is
someone giving a Muslim a dirty look, most Americans are
more worried about being gunned down at a shopping mall
by a crazed [Islamic] lunatic who treats his prayer mat better
than his three wives and who thinks 72 virgins are waiting for
him in paradise.

The establishment is frightened to death that Trump will win,
but not because they believe he will harm the nation. They are
afraid he will upset their taxpayer-subsidized apple carts.
While Obama threatens to veto legislation that spends too little,
they worry that Trump will veto legislation that spends too much.

You can be certain that if an establishment candidate wins in
November 2016 [their] cabinet positions will be filled with the
same people we've seen before. The washed-up has-beens
of the Clinton and Bush administrations will be back in charge.

The hacks from Goldman Sachs will continue to call the shots.

Whether it is Bush's Karl Rove or Clinton's John Podesta, who
makes the decisions in the White House will matter little.

If the establishment wins, America loses.

------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------

' The Great Gay Marriage Myth '

( Me at my place )

I am coming out and proudly declaring the following:
1. I am an Aussie white bloke of European decent!

2. I am heterosexual!

3. Although not religious I tend to believe in the so-called Christian values and beliefs!
Sir Mike's Comments 13/9/2016.
Also on my blog: www.beautkoot.blogspot.com.au
www.wordpress.com.
URL: http://beautkoot.blogspot.com.au

Subject: ' The Great Gay Marriage Myth '.

Teflon Billy Shorten the Federal Labor Opposition Leader, Union Heavyweight,
homosexual advocate, now an exponent of a Tax Payer funded theory of the Labor
Party's "Magic Pudding Economics" plus an alleged " Rapist " of his alleged victim
Kathy a then (16) year old vulnerable Labor Youth Camp girl in the early 1980's.

Tanya Plibersek the very " Left Wing " Federal Deputy Labor Opposition Leader

and a very strong advocate for " Gay Marriage " mainly because without the largest
community of LGBT's in Aussie in her electorate as her constituents voting for her,
Plibersek would not get into Federal Parliament, therefore I believe it is far less a

matter of " LOVE " but much more like political expediency.

Senator Richard Di Natale the Head Federal Greenie and also a great advocate for

" Gay Marriage ".

People the spruikers of " Gay Marriage " like the "Looney Left" Teflon Billy,Plibersek

and Di Natale and the LGBT mobs will try and make us believe that " Gay Marriage "
was accepted and welcomed by the like's of the populations of the UK, Ireland and
New Zealand which if anyone cares to investigate is so far from the truth it is absolute
rubbish, and were more political decisions than popular one's, and had they put it to a

compulsory " Plebiscite "it would have failed miserably as Teflon Billy and his mob

know only to well will happen here in Aussie.

President Obama

There is evidence that without a doubt if a ' Plebiscite' occurred in the USA it would
again" Dump Gay Marriage " regardless of the support that the greatest ' Lefty ' and
by all accounts,according to many unchallenged YouTube videos, homosexual President
Obama.

Let's take the UK first:

For those of us that watched David Cameron's final speech outside 10 Downing Street

when he resigned as UK's PM as a result of his devastating defeat of Brexit, where he

stated that one of his greatest achievements was getting " Gay Marriage " through as

law in the UK.

Even though 133 of Cameron's conservative MP's voted against it and it was only
pushed through with the Labor and minor parties votes.

From what I am reading in the UK press and media comments generally the majority
of the UK population with poll after poll of the population outside "Gay Centric London"
were opposed to not only " Gay Marriage " but the way it was forced on them like it or
not.

I am also reading many and various media reports and comments that this " Gay

Marriage " was the start of the UK's populations dissatisfaction with Cameron PM
and divided the Conservative Party badly and where Cameron PM was never able to
regain the confidence of not only the UK population,but the members of his own
Conservative Party who were continually under mining Cameron.

Therefore it is strongly thought that the UK population and his own Conservative
pollies used Brexit to punish him by voting for the UK to leave that financial sink hole
and basket case the EU.

David Cameron when being interviewed after he had stepped down as PM and Brexit

admitted he should have concentrated lessor on " Gay Marriage " and far more on the

economy and job creation.

( Take note Teflon Billy,Plibersek, Di Natali, Xenophon's mob and that sleeping media

tart Hinch )

Mrs Theresa May the current UK PM.

Baroness Lynne Featherstone who was the Liberal/Democrat Equalities Minister.

Well people it would appear according to many UK media reports that Cameron the

then UK PM was not the powerhouse behind the " Gay Marriage " legislation because

Theresa May, the now UK PM, and her cohort Baroness Lynne Featherstone the then

Lib/Dem Equalities Minister, where by some political skullduggery these two managed

to ambush the UK pollies via the ' The back door of Westminster after the 2010 UK

election via the EU ".

Skullduggery.

Seemingly there was no reference to " Gay Marriage " in the Tories/Conservative
2010 election manifesto.

However about (4) days before election day Theresa May pushed through a
pamphlet promising the LGBT group that the Tory party would consider legalising
" Same Sex Marriage ".

Once the Tories won the 2010 UK election T. May supported by the LGBT groups
and ably supported by L. Featherstone joined forces to drive the cause relentlessly
forward.

But however not through Westminster Parliament I gather but via the Strasbourg,

Council of Europe aided by a Judgment in it's attendant of the European Court of

Human Rights.

Seemingly May and Featherstone were so successful in convincing the European

mob that in March 2012 while Britain held the Council of Europe's Presidency
L. Featherstone gave a keynote speech to a ' CLOSED CONFERENCE NO PUBLIC

ALLOWED ' in Strasbourg where Featherstone, supported by some UK Judge, got

all the delegates present to agree to set June 2013 as a deadline where (47) countries

would make " Gay Marriage " law.

Then in February 2013 May and Featherstone suddenly thrust this European Council

decision on the Westminster Parliament catching the majority of pollies off guard,

and with the vehement and zealous use of ' Political Correctness and Blackmail ' even

though 133 Tory pollies voted against it, it was rammed through parliament with the

help of the votes from the Labor and minority Parties within months.

So when our Labor mob led by Teflon Billy Shorten, the Greenies,LGBT groups

and supporters say it was well accepted by the UK population they could ' NOT' be

more wrong, and this was supported by poll after poll outside " Gay centric London "

and the law was not supported by the majority of the UK population, but introduced

via the backdoor of Westminster via the next to useless bunch of European fat cats

who after all have all care and no responsibility in regard to the UK population

generally and was a ' Political Decision ' and not a ' Popular Decision ' and where
because the UK is part of the EU in most cases just rubber stamps these decisions

and ofcourse the ' Political Elite ' Messrs May and Featherstone and the LGBT mobs
were relying on this!!

This forcing through of the " Gay Marriage " law has seriously divided the UK
population outside' Gay Centric London ' and by all accounts has increased ten
fold the animosity, hostility and ' Hate Speech ' against the LGBT mobs creating
definite ' No Go Areas ' for them for fear of violence especially from the Muslim
communities.

This ' London Centric Political Elite ' making decisions for Scotland was ofcourse
the main reason that 45% of Scots wanted to break away from the UK, and it was
only Cameron the then UK PM in desperation to hold the UK together promising to
give the Scottish pollies and the Scottish parliament a greater say in the running
of the country of Scotland that convinced the other 55% of Scots to stay in the UK.

Ireland.

We will be informed by the promoters of " Gay Marriage " that 62% of the 3.2 million
Irish people eligible to vote in the Irish Referendum in regard to " Gay Marriage "
voted for the 'YES ' vote and ' 38% ' voted 'NO'.

Now ofcourse this is an exaggeration and an enhancement to bolster the pro

" Gay Marriage " cause, because outside the major cities like Dublin polls after

polls showed the majority of the Irish people were 'NOT' in favour of "Gay Marriage"

and because voting was not compulsory only 60% of the eligible 3.2 million voters,

which were bolstered by the many 1000's LGBT's expatriates and supporters coming

in from all over the world to vote 'YES', which amounted to only 1,920,000 in total
and where 40%, 1,280,000 voters, did not vote.

So if we break that down further it means that 62% of 1,920,000 = 1,190,400 voted

'YES' and 38% = 729,600 voted "NO'.

Now ofcourse we don't know why the 1,280,000 eligible voters did 'NOT' vote but

surely if the 'Referendum' had been compulsory who knows what the result combined

with 729,600 'NO' voters would have been, and regardless of the spin the 'PRO' LGBT

mob and supporters put on it this Irish situation does not mean an acceptance of

" Gay Marriage " in Ireland, in fact like the UK it has seriously split the Irish nation,

and from what I can gather put to another vote it would seriously fail.

New Zealand.

Now ofcourse our Aussie promoters of " Gay Marriage " hale the fact that in

February 2015 the Kiwi Parliament voted 77 pollies (64%) for " Same sex Marriage "

with 44 pollies (36%) voted against.

The 77 pollies that voted 'FOR' were made up of 30 Labor,14 Greenies = 44 with

33 others = 23 conservatives and 10 other smaller parties.

Although " Same Sex Marriage " is law in New Zealand as part of the Realm of New

Zealand the Cook Islands,Niue and Tokelau do not allow " Gay Marriage '.

Well people you have only to read the Kiwi media and comments to see that this

acting into law without a ' Plebiscite ' of " Same Sex Marriage " which had only
' Political support and certainly ' NOT ' the majority of the Kiwi population ' is a

farce.

Polls after polls showed the majority of Kiwi's where not in favour of legalised

" Same sex Marriage ".

In fact there were two polls conducted just prior to the vote in the NZ Parliament
regarding " Same Sex Marriage ", one of 17,000 Kiwi's, where the overwhelming

majority (78%) voted against " Same Sex Marriage " and 22% for.

Narell Henson wrote in the Wakato Times and expressed the community commonly

held view of " Same Sex Marriage ":

Quote:

Same Sex Marriage is not, by it's nature, the same as heterosexual marriage, it

never will be, no matter how much we fiddle with the law or censor the use of
words like ' Bride ' and ' Groom '. The fact that homosexual marriage does not tend
towards the conception and raising of children will forever set it apart.

Unquote:

Narell Henson went onto state a lot more on the same thyme in regard to " Same
Sex Marriage " but I believe this paragraph explains how the majority of the Kiwi

population feels about " Same Sex Marriage " and without a doubt they are not,

nor were they prior to the NZ Parliament in favour of " Same Sex Marriage " but

were ignored by the " Political Elite " and as such had the question been put to

the Kiwi population in regard to " Same Sex Marriage " via a 'Referendum' or even

a ' Plebiscite ' it would have got dumped big time!!!

Einstein.

People it don't take my mate Einstein to figure out that we Aussies are being

' Rail Roaded '/ ' Compelled '/ ' Social Engineered ' to accept that " Same Sex

Marriage" - " Gay Marriage " being " Gender Neutral " and being part of the
LGBT groups is a normal part of ' Mother Natures ' human phenomenon, and

regardless whether we agree or not we must accept the fact without question

and just shut up and cop it sweet because a bunch of misfit amateur pollies,

the " Political Elite " say we should.

The relationship between a male and female across the majority of Mother

Natures billions of creatures, whether it is referred to as a marriage or not, is

the only natural way we can procreate our various species,and pretend to infer

that any other relationship such as two males or females together can be put

into the same category or classification is ofcourse totally unnatural, not only

from a physical point of view but also from a majority human psychological,

rational and cognitive development, and that is why I believe this 'Social

Engineering ' of young children in regard to being " Gender Neutral " is nothing

more or less than ' Child Abuse ' of the worst kind !!

Ok people if you are going to cop this ' Social Engineering ' crap from these
minority groups and the ' Political Elite ' shoving this politically correct, totally

unnatural ideological demands down your and your loved ones throats without

fighting back,then don't whinge when their demands get more extreme, and they

will these bastards can't help themselves!!!

Sir Mike Howe - but you can call me Mike.