' The Great Gay Marriage Myth '

( Me at my place )

I am coming out and proudly declaring the following:
1. I am an Aussie white bloke of European decent!

2. I am heterosexual!

3. Although not religious I tend to believe in the so-called Christian values and beliefs!
Sir Mike's Comments 13/9/2016.
Also on my blog: www.beautkoot.blogspot.com.au
www.wordpress.com.
URL: http://beautkoot.blogspot.com.au

Subject: ' The Great Gay Marriage Myth '.

Teflon Billy Shorten the Federal Labor Opposition Leader, Union Heavyweight,
homosexual advocate, now an exponent of a Tax Payer funded theory of the Labor
Party's "Magic Pudding Economics" plus an alleged " Rapist " of his alleged victim
Kathy a then (16) year old vulnerable Labor Youth Camp girl in the early 1980's.

Tanya Plibersek the very " Left Wing " Federal Deputy Labor Opposition Leader

and a very strong advocate for " Gay Marriage " mainly because without the largest
community of LGBT's in Aussie in her electorate as her constituents voting for her,
Plibersek would not get into Federal Parliament, therefore I believe it is far less a

matter of " LOVE " but much more like political expediency.

Senator Richard Di Natale the Head Federal Greenie and also a great advocate for

" Gay Marriage ".

People the spruikers of " Gay Marriage " like the "Looney Left" Teflon Billy,Plibersek

and Di Natale and the LGBT mobs will try and make us believe that " Gay Marriage "
was accepted and welcomed by the like's of the populations of the UK, Ireland and
New Zealand which if anyone cares to investigate is so far from the truth it is absolute
rubbish, and were more political decisions than popular one's, and had they put it to a

compulsory " Plebiscite "it would have failed miserably as Teflon Billy and his mob

know only to well will happen here in Aussie.

President Obama

There is evidence that without a doubt if a ' Plebiscite' occurred in the USA it would
again" Dump Gay Marriage " regardless of the support that the greatest ' Lefty ' and
by all accounts,according to many unchallenged YouTube videos, homosexual President
Obama.

Let's take the UK first:

For those of us that watched David Cameron's final speech outside 10 Downing Street

when he resigned as UK's PM as a result of his devastating defeat of Brexit, where he

stated that one of his greatest achievements was getting " Gay Marriage " through as

law in the UK.

Even though 133 of Cameron's conservative MP's voted against it and it was only
pushed through with the Labor and minor parties votes.

From what I am reading in the UK press and media comments generally the majority
of the UK population with poll after poll of the population outside "Gay Centric London"
were opposed to not only " Gay Marriage " but the way it was forced on them like it or
not.

I am also reading many and various media reports and comments that this " Gay

Marriage " was the start of the UK's populations dissatisfaction with Cameron PM
and divided the Conservative Party badly and where Cameron PM was never able to
regain the confidence of not only the UK population,but the members of his own
Conservative Party who were continually under mining Cameron.

Therefore it is strongly thought that the UK population and his own Conservative
pollies used Brexit to punish him by voting for the UK to leave that financial sink hole
and basket case the EU.

David Cameron when being interviewed after he had stepped down as PM and Brexit

admitted he should have concentrated lessor on " Gay Marriage " and far more on the

economy and job creation.

( Take note Teflon Billy,Plibersek, Di Natali, Xenophon's mob and that sleeping media

tart Hinch )

Mrs Theresa May the current UK PM.

Baroness Lynne Featherstone who was the Liberal/Democrat Equalities Minister.

Well people it would appear according to many UK media reports that Cameron the

then UK PM was not the powerhouse behind the " Gay Marriage " legislation because

Theresa May, the now UK PM, and her cohort Baroness Lynne Featherstone the then

Lib/Dem Equalities Minister, where by some political skullduggery these two managed

to ambush the UK pollies via the ' The back door of Westminster after the 2010 UK

election via the EU ".

Skullduggery.

Seemingly there was no reference to " Gay Marriage " in the Tories/Conservative
2010 election manifesto.

However about (4) days before election day Theresa May pushed through a
pamphlet promising the LGBT group that the Tory party would consider legalising
" Same Sex Marriage ".

Once the Tories won the 2010 UK election T. May supported by the LGBT groups
and ably supported by L. Featherstone joined forces to drive the cause relentlessly
forward.

But however not through Westminster Parliament I gather but via the Strasbourg,

Council of Europe aided by a Judgment in it's attendant of the European Court of

Human Rights.

Seemingly May and Featherstone were so successful in convincing the European

mob that in March 2012 while Britain held the Council of Europe's Presidency
L. Featherstone gave a keynote speech to a ' CLOSED CONFERENCE NO PUBLIC

ALLOWED ' in Strasbourg where Featherstone, supported by some UK Judge, got

all the delegates present to agree to set June 2013 as a deadline where (47) countries

would make " Gay Marriage " law.

Then in February 2013 May and Featherstone suddenly thrust this European Council

decision on the Westminster Parliament catching the majority of pollies off guard,

and with the vehement and zealous use of ' Political Correctness and Blackmail ' even

though 133 Tory pollies voted against it, it was rammed through parliament with the

help of the votes from the Labor and minority Parties within months.

So when our Labor mob led by Teflon Billy Shorten, the Greenies,LGBT groups

and supporters say it was well accepted by the UK population they could ' NOT' be

more wrong, and this was supported by poll after poll outside " Gay centric London "

and the law was not supported by the majority of the UK population, but introduced

via the backdoor of Westminster via the next to useless bunch of European fat cats

who after all have all care and no responsibility in regard to the UK population

generally and was a ' Political Decision ' and not a ' Popular Decision ' and where
because the UK is part of the EU in most cases just rubber stamps these decisions

and ofcourse the ' Political Elite ' Messrs May and Featherstone and the LGBT mobs
were relying on this!!

This forcing through of the " Gay Marriage " law has seriously divided the UK
population outside' Gay Centric London ' and by all accounts has increased ten
fold the animosity, hostility and ' Hate Speech ' against the LGBT mobs creating
definite ' No Go Areas ' for them for fear of violence especially from the Muslim
communities.

This ' London Centric Political Elite ' making decisions for Scotland was ofcourse
the main reason that 45% of Scots wanted to break away from the UK, and it was
only Cameron the then UK PM in desperation to hold the UK together promising to
give the Scottish pollies and the Scottish parliament a greater say in the running
of the country of Scotland that convinced the other 55% of Scots to stay in the UK.

Ireland.

We will be informed by the promoters of " Gay Marriage " that 62% of the 3.2 million
Irish people eligible to vote in the Irish Referendum in regard to " Gay Marriage "
voted for the 'YES ' vote and ' 38% ' voted 'NO'.

Now ofcourse this is an exaggeration and an enhancement to bolster the pro

" Gay Marriage " cause, because outside the major cities like Dublin polls after

polls showed the majority of the Irish people were 'NOT' in favour of "Gay Marriage"

and because voting was not compulsory only 60% of the eligible 3.2 million voters,

which were bolstered by the many 1000's LGBT's expatriates and supporters coming

in from all over the world to vote 'YES', which amounted to only 1,920,000 in total
and where 40%, 1,280,000 voters, did not vote.

So if we break that down further it means that 62% of 1,920,000 = 1,190,400 voted

'YES' and 38% = 729,600 voted "NO'.

Now ofcourse we don't know why the 1,280,000 eligible voters did 'NOT' vote but

surely if the 'Referendum' had been compulsory who knows what the result combined

with 729,600 'NO' voters would have been, and regardless of the spin the 'PRO' LGBT

mob and supporters put on it this Irish situation does not mean an acceptance of

" Gay Marriage " in Ireland, in fact like the UK it has seriously split the Irish nation,

and from what I can gather put to another vote it would seriously fail.

New Zealand.

Now ofcourse our Aussie promoters of " Gay Marriage " hale the fact that in

February 2015 the Kiwi Parliament voted 77 pollies (64%) for " Same sex Marriage "

with 44 pollies (36%) voted against.

The 77 pollies that voted 'FOR' were made up of 30 Labor,14 Greenies = 44 with

33 others = 23 conservatives and 10 other smaller parties.

Although " Same Sex Marriage " is law in New Zealand as part of the Realm of New

Zealand the Cook Islands,Niue and Tokelau do not allow " Gay Marriage '.

Well people you have only to read the Kiwi media and comments to see that this

acting into law without a ' Plebiscite ' of " Same Sex Marriage " which had only
' Political support and certainly ' NOT ' the majority of the Kiwi population ' is a

farce.

Polls after polls showed the majority of Kiwi's where not in favour of legalised

" Same sex Marriage ".

In fact there were two polls conducted just prior to the vote in the NZ Parliament
regarding " Same Sex Marriage ", one of 17,000 Kiwi's, where the overwhelming

majority (78%) voted against " Same Sex Marriage " and 22% for.

Narell Henson wrote in the Wakato Times and expressed the community commonly

held view of " Same Sex Marriage ":

Quote:

Same Sex Marriage is not, by it's nature, the same as heterosexual marriage, it

never will be, no matter how much we fiddle with the law or censor the use of
words like ' Bride ' and ' Groom '. The fact that homosexual marriage does not tend
towards the conception and raising of children will forever set it apart.

Unquote:

Narell Henson went onto state a lot more on the same thyme in regard to " Same
Sex Marriage " but I believe this paragraph explains how the majority of the Kiwi

population feels about " Same Sex Marriage " and without a doubt they are not,

nor were they prior to the NZ Parliament in favour of " Same Sex Marriage " but

were ignored by the " Political Elite " and as such had the question been put to

the Kiwi population in regard to " Same Sex Marriage " via a 'Referendum' or even

a ' Plebiscite ' it would have got dumped big time!!!

Einstein.

People it don't take my mate Einstein to figure out that we Aussies are being

' Rail Roaded '/ ' Compelled '/ ' Social Engineered ' to accept that " Same Sex

Marriage" - " Gay Marriage " being " Gender Neutral " and being part of the
LGBT groups is a normal part of ' Mother Natures ' human phenomenon, and

regardless whether we agree or not we must accept the fact without question

and just shut up and cop it sweet because a bunch of misfit amateur pollies,

the " Political Elite " say we should.

The relationship between a male and female across the majority of Mother

Natures billions of creatures, whether it is referred to as a marriage or not, is

the only natural way we can procreate our various species,and pretend to infer

that any other relationship such as two males or females together can be put

into the same category or classification is ofcourse totally unnatural, not only

from a physical point of view but also from a majority human psychological,

rational and cognitive development, and that is why I believe this 'Social

Engineering ' of young children in regard to being " Gender Neutral " is nothing

more or less than ' Child Abuse ' of the worst kind !!

Ok people if you are going to cop this ' Social Engineering ' crap from these
minority groups and the ' Political Elite ' shoving this politically correct, totally

unnatural ideological demands down your and your loved ones throats without

fighting back,then don't whinge when their demands get more extreme, and they

will these bastards can't help themselves!!!

Sir Mike Howe - but you can call me Mike.