Sir Mike's Comments: " Gay Marriage, where Equal Rights May end up ?? "

( Me at my Place )

I am coming out loud and proud and declaring the following:

1. I am an Aussie white bloke of European descent!

2. I am heterosexual!

3. Although non religious I tend to believe in the so-called Christian values/beliefs!

Sir Mike's Comments 2/9/2015.

Also on my blog: www.beautkoot.blogspot.com.au

URL:http://beautkoot.blogspot.com.au
Subject: " Gay Marriage, where Equal Rights May end up ?? "

People I realise that the attached email that I have just received is supposed to be in that ironic way some what " Tongue in Cheek " and humorous but as I see it as the saying goes " Many a true word is spoken in jest " and I believe this attached email - author unknown - scroll down - is a perfect example and epitomises the mess these either politically naive or ones with a self-interest pollies are going to get this nation into!!!???.

Let's take a look at the situation and will the " Equal Rights Law and Same Sex Marriage Act "

stipulate the following???:

1. Will the (2) blokes that want to marry have to be " Gay " or the (2) women have to be lesbians and if so what proof do they have to produce before they are entitled to any Tax Payer funds that hetro married couples are generally entitled to at various stages of married life.

? if no proof is required just my word of mouth then:

2. Could (2) hetro blokes declare their dying love for each other then get married and also claim any Tax Payer funded Marital benefits?? if not why not?? equal rights yes!! but only for "Gays" and lesbians ???

However if (2) Hetro blokes and (2) Hetro females declare their undying love for each other and declare themselves " Gay" and " Lesbian" respectively and get married but later apply for a divorce and one party in spite declares that they are not or were not " Gays" or " Lesbians " after receiving any Tax Payers marital funds once producing children either
adopted or by artificial insemination??:

2a. What would the penalty be?

2b. How would the courts decide who was telling the truth?

3. Will the law stipulate that brother & brother? sister & sister? parent & sibling of either gender? sister & brother? although not either " Gay " or " Lesbian " therefore would not probably contravene the " Incest Act " once declaring their undying love for each other be allowed to marry and claim any marital Tax Payer funds if say like the gays and lesbians they adopted a child or children?? if not why not?? does "Gender" only become applicable if the " Gender " declares themselves " Gay" or " Lesbian "??? discrimination??.

People I believe that applying the use of a couple of metaphors like " Scrambled Eggs " and " Opening a can of worms " spring immediately to mind when looking at the " Gay Marriage " issue and would be in reality gross understatements because the majority of these amateur pollies - together with their bosses the bureaucrats - make such a collective mess of every
major issue this great Aussie Nation faces especially how to run this country as a self supporting financial identity?? and as a result of decades of governments bad management across the board and the political spectrum we are going down the financial gurgle and this rushed " Gay Marriage " issue will be no different!!!.

However people if your happy with the way these short term! self interest! pollies squander
our hard earned Taxes, Fees and Charges for political & personal gain then don't whinge

when the " Closed " sign " No funds available " is put up at the Centrelink Offices near you!

Centrelink.

Read and weep or better still get angry when our bloody pollies spend so much time concerning themselves with a minority noisy in your face bunch of Aussies that declare that because they love each other and as a result of their sexual preference our pollies devote so much precious parliamentary time when as I have stated many! many! times in mike's comments that we the majority ( 97%) hetro's of the Aussie Nation have serious problems requiring urgent attention from the cradle to the grave!!

Parliament - of the people – for the people?? What a farce!!!!! a ' Pox on both houses ' - if you can't sell used cars become a pollie ?? even then I doubt most of them would make a living!!

Parliament is mainly made up of of over paid, self-interested, egotistical, conceited, narcissistic, self absorbed political and bureaucratic amateurs with a snout in the Tax Payer Funded trough, winner takes all, with a very short political shelf life!!!

Sir Mike Howe - but you can call me Mike. scroll down.

Where Equal Rights May End UP

Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license."

"Names?", said the clerk.

"Tim and Jim Jones."

"Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance."

"Yes, we're brothers."

"Brothers? You can't get married."

"Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?"

"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"

"Incest?" No, we are not gay."

"Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?"

"For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects."

"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've claim they'd been denied equal protection

under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman."

"Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't

mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim."

"And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?"

"All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next."

"Hi. We are here to get married."

"Names?"

"John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson."

"Who wants to marry whom?"

"We all want to marry each other."

"But there are four of you!"

"That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and

Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our

sexual preferences in a marital relationship."

"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."

"So you're discriminating against bisexuals!"

"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples."

"Since when are you standing on tradition?"

"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."

"Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights!

The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!"

"All right, all right. Next."

"Hello, I'd like a marriage license."

"In what names?"

"David Anderson."

"And the other man?"

"That's all. I want to marry myself."

"Marry yourself? What do you mean?"

"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint

income-tax return."

"That does it! I quit! You people are making a mockery of marriage!"

Sir Mike's Comments

Wednesday 2 September 2015

" Gay Marriage, where Equal Rights May end up ?? "

About Me